Home | About us | News & Media | Contact us

Chapter 6: Officer duties

The RO Act requirements

The duties placed on officers under the RO Act are central to the good contemporary governance and effective operation of organisations. They also seek to encourage high standards of accountability of organisations to their members. The duties owed under the RO Act apply in relation to the financial management of the organisation and are called general duties. 

 
     
Idea
     

Useful Tip: Our digital classroom includes a module on officers duties

The digital classroom links together a number of our resources to assist you with self guided learning on critical topics like officers duties, disclosures and working with the regulator.

For a detailed look at each of the duties please see the digital classroom.

 

It’s important to be aware that these general duties don’t just apply to senior officers, they extend to all officers in an organisation. Some of these duties also apply to employees. 

You can think of the duties as a minimum standard of conduct for officers and employees of a registered organisation. There may also be duties that must be followed under your rules.

As discussed above, good governance are the systems and processes that are put in place to reinforce and support the requirements of the legislation. Together the RO Act and good governance work to build a culture of compliance, accountability and transparency.

Let’s explore some of the key duties as well as possible good governance processes applicable to them.
 

Care and diligence (s. 285)

Officers must exercise their powers and discharge their duties with the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person would exercise if he or she were an officer holding an equivalent position. This obligation is subject to a ‘reasonable judgment’ rule.

The members of a Committee of Management must exercise care and diligence in dealing with financial matters, including when considering and approving financial reports. If the members of a Committee of Management approve a financial report at the end of a financial year without adequately considering it, and the financial report contains significant errors, potentially they may be liable for a penalty. 

 

 

     
Case study
     

ASIC v Healey

In the case of ASIC v Healey, the directors of a company called Centro were found to have breached the equivalent duty under the Corporations Act 2001 by approving financial statements that had substantially understated Centro’s short-term liabilities. The Court found that the liabilities that were omitted from the financial statements were well known to the directors of Centro, or if not, they should have been due to their position as directors. 

The Court found that if the directors had exercised care and diligence each director would have noticed that short term liabilities of a significant amount were missing and questioned the omission. 

This case provides a good example for officers of registered organisations who are responsible for considering financial matters such as the approval of the financial reports.

 

To assist officers to fulfil this duty, organisations could:

  • provide materials well ahead of meetings to allow appropriate time for reading
  • encourage questions at meetings or even in advance of meetings
  • promote that individual officers are responsible for collective decisions
  • provide information and (where appropriate) experts to help officers to understand the decisions they are being asked to make
  • ensure all officers are up to date on their financial training including any refreshers
  • provide financial report comprehension training
     

Good Faith and Proper Purpose (s. 286) 

Officers must exercise their powers and discharge their duties in good faith in what the officer believes to be the best interests of the organisation, and for a proper purpose. This involves the subjective question as to what the officer believes but also the objective question as to whether the conduct discloses a proper purpose.

 

 

     
Case study
     

Fair Work Commission v McGiveron and Burton

In the case of Fair Work Commission v McGiveron and Burton, it was alleged that the officers changed an internal policy concerning redundancy payments to the benefit of one of the officers and purchased luxury vehicles for their own use.

The court found they had not adequately disclosed their interest in these matters to the committee of management (including personal benefits that they would receive) and had participated in the decision-making processes in which they had a personal interest, and had therefore breached their duties as officers. They were each ordered to pay penalties.  

 

To assist officers to fulfil this duty, organisations should:

  • ensure multiple officers are responsible for signing off purchases
  • have standard agenda items in meetings to disclose conflicts of interest 
  • keep records of who leaves meetings when conflicts are disclosed
  • ensure that any large purchases and projects expressly include information of how it furthers the organisation’s interests
  • have forms and standard templates for identifying conflicts or risk for big decisions
  • have clear policies requiring large decisions to be brought before the committee of management
  • encourage a speak-up culture.
     

Not to Misuse Position (s. 287) 

Officers and employees must not improperly use their position to gain an advantage for themselves or someone else or to cause detriment to the organisation or another person.

 
     
Case study
     

Health Services Union v Jackson

In the case of Health Services Union v Jackson, a former National Secretary of a union was found to have used union funds for personal expenditure including travel, food and entertainment, authorised overpayment of her salary, signed and cashed cheques in an unauthorised manner and engaged legal representation for allegations made against her without authorisation. 

The court ordered the officer to pay more than $1.4 million in compensation due to multiple breaches of the duty not to misuse position. 

The case demonstrates that officers cannot use members’ funds for personal expenditure. 

 

To assist officers to fulfil this duty, organisations could:

  • have clear policies around credit card use and organisation spending
  • educate officers that personal spending is not allowed on organisation credit cards and enforce policies around repayment if it accidentally occurs
  • maintain a register of interests and standing disclosures
  • regularly reconcile bank or credit card accounts
  • use panels for hiring, pay increases or internal promotion 

Not to Misuse Information (s. 288) 

Officers and employees must not misuse information they have obtained as a result of being an officer or employee of an organisation to gain an advantage for themselves or someone else or cause detriment to the organisation or another person.

 
     
Idea
     

Useful Tip: Do you have a tip for us?

The ROC learns many of its good governance tips from reading about what organisations are doing in this space. If your organisation has a great idea that helps you support your officers and their officer duties, please let us know – regorgs@roc.gov.au 

 

Further resources

Duties of officers guidance note

 

Go back to:
Good Governance Guide introduction

spacer

Next chapter 7: 
Managing conflicts of interest